Legal Opinion

Murosky v. Spaulding

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1958No. Appeal, 213PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The sole question in this appeal is whether the court below abused its discretion in failing to grant a new trial because of the inadequacy of the verdict.

On June 12, 1955, at approximately 10:00 p.m. on a rainy evening, Thomas R. Murosky was killed in a collision between an automobile driven by Jerome W. Spaulding and one driven by James P. Junod. Murosky was a passenger in the Junod car. In the ensuing lawsuit instituted by Joseph Murosky, father of Thomas Murosky, the jury awarded a verdict in the amount of $3,000.00 in a survival action and $1,332.93 in a death action.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Carpenelli v. Scranton Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Krusinski v. CHIODA.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Hutchison v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Elza v. ChovanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cason v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Mains v. MOORESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Daccorso v. George F. Otto Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Murosky v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Mains v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API