Legal Opinion

Murosky v. Spaulding

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1960No. Appeals, 170 and 187PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bv

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

These appeals present in slightly novel guise an old inquiry: do the circumstances warrant an appellate court in reversing the grant of a new trial in a trespass action by a lower court?

The factual background of this litigation was stated by Judge Ervin speaking for the Superior Court in Murosky v. Spaulding, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 306, 146 A. 2d 339: “. . . Junod, with . . . Murosky as a passenger, was operating his vehicle in an eastwardly direction on II. S. Route 5 at about 10:00 p.m. on a rainy night. . . . Spaulding was operating Ms vehicle, . . .…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Beal v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Morse Boulger Destructor Co. v. ArnoniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A. J. Aberman, Inc. v. Funk Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. ACQUAVIVA v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Hartwell v. Allied Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. In re Estate of BanesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Koch v. HarshawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API