Daccorso v. George F. Otto Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bok,
Plaintiffs’ decedent died in the accident for which they later brought suit, as administrators, under the applicable legislation for both wrongful death and survival. At trial the action for wrongful death was abandoned.
Tlie jury found for plaintiffs in the sum of $8565, which the court below has set aside by ordering a new trial. The court has effectively limited its action to the single reason of inadequacy, and has given the following explanation: “We are convinced that in view of all the testimony offered by the plaintiffs and not contradicted in any way by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Schwartz v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Patterson v. Palley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Krusinski v. CHIODA.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gottlob v. HillegasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Rutter v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- ROGERS v. HammettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Salemmo v. DolanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Murosky v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.