Legal Opinion

United States v. Craddock

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 23, 1994No. Crim. No. H-90-26Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HITTNER, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed by petitioner Veronica Craddock (“Craddock”). Having considered the motion, the submissions on file, the arguments of counsel at a hearing conducted before the Court on January 6, 1994, and the applicable law, the Court determines that the motion should be denied and the Court declines to intervene in the deportation of defendant Craddock.

On November 26, 1990, Craddock pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture in excess of 100 grams of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Derrick Downs-Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. BandaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. William B. Prince, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Gil Ricardo GavilanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Andres R. Romero-VilcaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API