Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co. v. Nunnemaker
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. Action at law by T. W. Nunnemaker against the Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
The Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Company, plaintiff in error, hereafter called the defendant, had contracts by *33which it was to construct the so-called McKinley bridge at St. Louis. Mo., and the approach thereto on the Missouri side. The defendant had taken two separate contracts, one to build the bridge and one to build the approach thereto. These contracts were not only separate but their execution was largely kept separate. T. W. Cartledge was superintendent of construction of the approach and had two foremen under him, John B. Ryker and Henry Smith. There were…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kreigh v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Wachsmuth v. Shaw Electric Crane Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Stork v. Charles Stolper Cooperage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sheltrown v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Rule v. GiuglioMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Cooper v. Penn Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1918