Legal Opinion

Dezell v. Pike

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1972No. 43031PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

The question before us is whether, under the terms of a testamentary trust, a beneficiary described as “my daughter-in-law, Margaret Dezell,” may take if, after the death of the settlor, she is divorced from the settlor’s son. The trial court held she was not entitled to take, and we reverse.

Donald Dezell, a son of the settlor, Rosalia Dezell, was married to Margaret Dezell in 1943. In 1960, Rosalia executed a will creating a trust which required payments of $50 a month to *180Donald for life with the following provision effective upon his death:

“From and after the death of my said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. In re the Express Trust Made by LachlanNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In re MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. In re MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
  5. Will of Buchanan v. BuchananWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Will of DezellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API