Legal Opinion

In re Miller

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 11, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by Oscar Clark Miller from a decree ofy the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York, entered in the office of said Surrogate’s Court on the 1st day of April, 1915, dismissing the petition herein.

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J. —

Sarah Akin made her last will and testament on April 13, 1908, and! thereby, among other legacies, by the *319th. clause thereof gave and bequeathed to her trustees the sum of $25,000 in trust, to invest the same, “ to collect the rents, income and profits thereof, and to pay the net income arising therefrom to my nephew Oscar Clark Miller during the term of his life,” with directions as to the disposition of the principal after his death. Oscar Clark Miller was then married to Julia A. Miller. The answer of.the trustees to the petition herein sets up that Miller abandoned his wife…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schult v. . MollNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Durian v. Central Verein of the Hermann's SœhnneNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1877
  3. Salvin v. SalvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. In re the Estate of AkinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McComb v. Utica Knitting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Dezell v. PikeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. In Re Will of DezellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. McComb v. Utica Knitting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API