State ex rel. Spencer Lens Co. v. Searle
Nebraska Supreme Court
Original application for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent, as auditor of public accounts, to draw a warrant in payment of an allowed claim in favor of relator. Respondent demurred.
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
Demurrer overruled. Writ allowed. Opinion to be filed later.
The following opinion was filed November 10, 1906:
Colleges and Universities: Expenditures. The money donated by the United States to the university of Nebraska by an act of congress approved March 2, 1887, and acts supplemental thereto, known as the “Experimental Station” fund, may he expended by the hoard of regents for the purposes expressed by the donation, without other or more specific legislative appropriation than that implied by section 2, art. VIII of the constitution, and contained in section 19, ch. 87, Comp.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Regents of University of Nebraska v. McConnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- State ex rel. McLean v. LiedtkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- State ex rel. Board of Regents v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- State ex rel. Bessey v. BabcockNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State ex rel. Bonner v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska v. ExonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Ledwith v. BrianNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.