Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fernandez
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided March 21, 1984No. Civ. 83-484PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILKINS, Senior District Judge
of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sitting by Designation.
Plaintiff State Farm’s motion for summary judgment came on for hearing February 13, 1984. There are no material issues of fact genuinely in dispute and State Farm has proved its right to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, summary judgment is granted in State Farm’s favor. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).
I
The facts in this case are not disputed. On June 13, 1981, at about 2:00 a.m., defendant Fernandez left the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Midwest Mutual Insurance Company v. SantiestebanSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- NATIONAL AMERICAN INS. v. Ins. Co. of N. AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Day v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sheldon B. Fernandez, and Marlene J. MiraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Field v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1991
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PichayDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1993