Legal Opinion

Day v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1978No. 911PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

In this action of assumpsit brought on the uninsured motorist provision of a policy of automobile insurance written by the appellant and issued to the appellee, an arbitrator acting under the provisions of the Arbitration Act of 1927, 5 P.S. 161 et seq. made a finding in favor of the appellant, State Farm Insurance Company. (State Farm).

On the petition of the appellee, Day, to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County to modify, correct and/or vacate the arbitrator’s award, that court, by the Honorable Stanley Greenberg, after argument, but without taking additional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bankes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Ferry v. Protective Indemnity Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Wheeler v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Presbyterian-University of Pennsylvania Medical Center v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance v. SquiresCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. OlivierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  4. Erie Insurance Exchange v. EisenhuthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Schweitzer v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API