Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1982PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the Court of Criminal Appeals was in error in holding that, where the prosecuting instrument is a warrant, the ultimate disposition of the case must be on that charging instrument; and the State cannot prosecute a defendant on a presentment (or indictment) after the dismissal of the warrant. We granted the State’s Rule 11 application for permission to appeal in order to determine the propriety of bringing a presentment against a defendant, after the trial judge’s dismissal of what he termed a warrant that was void initially…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. LongstreetTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Robert F. O'Neal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Waugh v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. PrinceTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Linda Beard v. James William BransonTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. FerranteTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API