Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1996PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The single1 issue in this consolidated appeal is purely a question of law and requires a determination of whether a remand for resentencing is appropriate when an appellate court in a capital case concludes the sole aggravating circumstance found by the original sentencing jury is legally invalid and sets aside the sentence of death. Because there is no legal principle which precludes the State from seeking the death penalty upon resentencing, a remand for that purpose is appropriate. Accordingly, the Court of Criminal Appeals’ judgments modifying the sentences…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. BaneTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. NesbitTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State of Tennessee v. Hubert Glenn SextonTennessee Supreme Court · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API