State v. Prince
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’BRIEN, Justice.
These post-conviction cases were consolidated for appeal purposes in order to elucidate appropriate procedures in cases of this nature. They present substantially the same facts and issues. Both defendants were convicted of felonies triggering the habitual criminal statute and found to be habitual criminals. Their habitual criminal convictions were grounded in part on sever*848al convictions based on guilty pleas made in prior years.
The defendants unsuccessfully pursued direct appeals of their convictions for the triggering felonies and the enhancement of their sentences…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. MacKeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. McClintockTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Blankenship v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Jaco v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Bankston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.