Legal Opinion
Farrell v. City of Syracuse
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cheney,
x.g this action to obtain a permanent injunction i administrate causing to Í about the c, General Ord. council of th taxicabs, and endants, the city of Syracuse and its :n any wise doing or attempting or ■’manee, conduct or act in or for or ■t any of the matters set forth in ted June 16, 1924, by the common use setting aside certain stands for daring said ordinance null and void; and has moved iur a temporary injunction pending the determination of the action.
It appears that on March 31, 1924, the common council of the city of Syracuse passed an ordinance regulating generally the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Wallack v. Society for Reformation of Juvenile DelinquentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Veneman v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Waldorf-Astoria Hotel Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Eden Musee American Co. v. BinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. GalenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Russo v. MorganNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- City of New York v. Yellow Taxi Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Lynbrook Transportation Co. v. Incorporated Village of LynbrookNew York Supreme Court · 1965