Legal Opinion

People v. Galena

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1937No. Cr. A. 139PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, P. J.

The defendant, as the operator of a taxicab owned by the Luxor Cab Company, was arrested and prosecuted upon a charge of violating section 47 of ordinance No. 6979, adopted in 1926 and known as the taxicab ordinance, in that defendant “did unlawfully and wilfully stand upon a public street, to-wit, Ulloa Street and West Portal, on north side of Ulloa Street, while waiting employment by passengers, at a place designated and established for other vehicles or taxicabs and operated by the Yellow Cab Company in accordance with said ordinance.”

It appears without conflict that the chief of police…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Greene v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Hadfield v. LundinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In re FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Yellow Cab Taxi Service v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Slater v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Cotta v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Iscoff v. POLICE COMMISSION OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API