People v. Mirenda
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Cooke.
This appeal raises the question whether the trial • court erred in refusing to appoint standby counsel to assist defendant in presenting his own defense. A criminal defendant has a constitutional right to be represented by counsel, or to proceed pro se. A defendant has no constitutional right, however, to the assistance of a lawyer while conducting a pro se defense. The order of the Appellate Division, therefore, should be affirmed.
Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of three counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. SprowalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. GethersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.