Legal Opinion

People v. Mirenda

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1982PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Cooke.

This appeal raises the question whether the trial • court erred in refusing to appoint standby counsel to assist defendant in presenting his own defense. A criminal defendant has a constitutional right to be represented by counsel, or to proceed pro se. A defendant has no constitutional right, however, to the assistance of a lawyer while conducting a pro se defense. The order of the Appellate Division, therefore, should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of three counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. SprowalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. GethersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API