Legal Opinion

In re Haensell

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 6, 1899No. 2,765PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

This is an application by the bankrupt for an order permitting him to prosecute to judgment a certain action, commenced by him prior to the date of his being adjudged a bankrupt, and now pending in one of the courts of the state, to recover damages for his malicious prosecution and arrest upon a criminal charge. The present motion is necessarily based upon the assumption that the right to any damages which may be recovered in the action to which it refers is vested in the trustee in bankruptcy, for, if the bankrupt’s original right to recover damages for such alleged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Noonan v. OrtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. In re CrockettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1868

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Grinnell v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. In re Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1910
  3. Ruebush v. FunkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  4. Beechwood v. Joplin-Pittsburg Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Hansen Mercantile Co. v. Wyman, Partridge & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API