Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 9, 2012No. 1 CA-CV 11-0519PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Judge.

¶ 1 This is an appeal taken from the trial court’s order determining that Appellant, Marlene Richardson, was responsible for payment of the mortgage interest and all other expenses associated with the life estate interest she received in Decedent J. Scott Gardner’s Prescott house (“the Property”). Richardson challenges the court’s finding that her disclaimer was barred under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 14-10013(B)(1). Based on Richardson’s conduct in continuing to occupy the Property to the exclusion of others, her knowledge of her liability for expenses…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Nelson v. Phoenix Resort Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Abbott v. Inhabitants of Cottage CityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Evans v. BlankenshipArizona Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Blake v. BlakeOregon Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Socaa v. Dtt AccCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  2. Spore v. CampeauCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API