Legal Opinion
Hightower v. Roman, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 6, 2002No. Civil Action 00-3847(SSB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Roman Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s motion is denied in part and granted in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Shannon Hightower (“High-tower”) and Jamie Wallace (“Wallace”), African American employees of Defendant Roman, Inc (“Roman”), asserted various Title YII claims against Roman for alleged acts of racial harassment and discrimination. Roman is a New Jersey corporation, primarily in the business of caulking, that was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hargrave v. County of AtlanticDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Adams v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- CARTER v. PSEG SERVICES CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- DESIRE v. DREAMWEAR INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- GAMBRELL v. SOUTH BRUNSWICK BOARD OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.