Legal Opinion
Adams v. City of Camden
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 8, 2006No. Civil Action 05-779 (JBS)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of two defendants, the City of Camden and the Camden Police Department, for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 [Docket Item 14], For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny the motion in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts as set forth here are those viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, Plaintiff Brian Adams. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986).
Plaintiff is a forty-nine year-old man who lives…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hoag v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Merman v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Panarello v. City of VinelandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Blakeslee v. Clinton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Grubbs v. University of Delaware Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.