Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Union Bank and Trust of Bartlesville

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 30, 1991No. 90-C-921-CPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

H. DALE COOK, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for summary judgment against plaintiffs and against third-party defendant.

This action began in state court, with plaintiffs seeking to have various financial instruments which plaintiffs executed declared void.

Plaintiffs asserted that Union Bank and Trust of Bartlesville (Union Bank) violated 12 U.S.C. § 1972, which prohibits a bank from conditioning extension of credit or continuation of extension of credit upon a customer’s assuming debts held by the bank. Plaintiffs also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Patsy Anderson v. United Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Eagle Properties, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1985
  4. Circle v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  5. Eash v. PenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hammons v. EhneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Integra Bank/Pittsburgh v. FreemanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. CMF Virginia Land, L.P. v. BrinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. SchonacherDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Riggs Nat. Bank of Washington, DC v. LinchDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API