Legal Opinion
Golden v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
Decided July 11, 2005No. 16694-04LUnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT H. GOLDEN AND JUDITH A. GOLDEN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Golden v. Comm'r
No. 16694-04L
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2005-170; 2005 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 170; 90 T.C.M. (CCH) 33;
July 11, 2005, Filed
Robert H. Golden and Judith A. Golden, pro sese.
A. Gary Begun, for respondent.
Dean, John F
JOHN F. DEAN
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEAN, Special Trial Judge: This case is before the Court on respondent's motion for partial summary judgment filed pursuant to Rule 121. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. All section references are to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Frank Erickson and Amelia Erickson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Golden v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Golden v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007
- Pomerantz v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2005
- Robert Golden v. Comm'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008