Legal Opinion

Frank Erickson and Amelia Erickson v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 7, 1962No. 318-59PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

This is primarily a suit for refund of interest, collected on delayed tax payments, which* the plaintiffs would deny to the Government because of the special history of their prior tax litigation. The case has its origin in the income tax returns filed by Frank Erickson, the taxpayer, 1 for the years 1937-1950 (exclusive of 1941). In January 1951, on the ground that the returns were fraudulent, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue made jeopardy assessments of tax, fraud penalty, and deficiency interest for each of the years 1937-1946 (except 1941) in large sums varying in amount…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Fuller v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Naftel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  2. Cities Service Helex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Krueger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  4. Lane Co. Ex Rel. Lane v. Busch Development, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hess v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API