Legal Opinion

Gatterdam v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1936No. 25945. Department OnePublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury awarding the respondent compensation, under the workmen’s compensation act, for the death of her husband consequent upon injuries sustained in extrahazardous employment.

The deceased husband, while in the course of his employment, on October 21, 1929, had his great toe crushed. On the following day, he filed his claim for compensation with the department. The claim was recognized and payment made for time loss and medical aid. He later returned to work, and his claim was closed. Subsequently, osteomyelitis developed in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Claim of Delinousha v. National Biscuit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Hepner v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Wiles v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kelly v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. PachecoWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Orcutt v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. McFarland v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Berndt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Dickson v. BoberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API