Legal Opinion

Entzie v. Entzie

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2010No. 20100067PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Allen Entzie appeals and Theresa Entzie cross-appeals from an amended judgment modifying Allen Entzie’s child support obligation. We hold the district court erred as a matter of law by failing to comply with the child support guidelines, and we reverse and remand the district court’s calculation of Allen Entzie’s child support obligation. We affirm the district court’s deviation from the child support guidelines for the children’s needs and affirm the award of partial attorney fees.

I

[¶ 2] Allen Entzie is a self-employed farmer. Allen Entzie and Theresa Entzie were…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Dronen v. DronenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Berge v. BergeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Conzemius v. ConzemiusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Brew v. BrewNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API