Legal Opinion

Tory v. Cochran

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 31, 2005No. 03-1488PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

Johnnie Cochran brought a state-law defamation action against petitioner Ulysses Tory. The state trial court determined that Tory (with the help of petitioner Ruth Craft and others) had engaged in unlawful defamatory activity. . It found, for example, that Tory, while claiming falsely that Cochran owed him money, had complained to the local bar association, had written Cochran threatening letters demanding $10 million, had picketed Cochran’s office holding up signs containing various insults and obscenities; and, with a group of associates, had pursued Cochran while chanting similar threats…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Carroll v. President & Commissioners of Princess AnneSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus ProjectCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Sindi v. El-MoslimanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  3. Flentye v. KathreinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. Kinney v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  5. St. James Healthcare v. ColeMontana Supreme Court · 2008

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API