Kinney v. Barnes
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lehrmann
A hallmark of the right to free speech under both the U.S. and Texas Constitutions is the maxim that prior restraints are a heavily disfavored infringement of that right. So great is our reticence to condone prior restraints that we refuse to allow even unprotected speech to be banned if restraining such speech would also chill a substantial amount of protected speech. This danger is before the Court today, as we are asked whether a permanent injunction restraining future speech is a constitutionally permissible remedy for defamation following an adjudication on the merits. On the one hand,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Allen Chadwick Burbage v. W. Kirk Burbage and Burbage Funeral HomeTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- D Magazine Partners, L.P. v. RosenthalTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Sindi v. El-MoslimanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Landry's, Inc. and Houston Aquarium, Inc. v. Animal Legal Defense Fund, Carney Anne Nasser, and Cheryl Conley, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- TM v. MZMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.