Legal Opinion
Romano v. Bible
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1999No. 97-17019PublishedCited by 151 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
Frank Romano voluntarily relinquished his gaming license and later wanted it back, claiming that the defendants violated his due process and equal protection rights. When the Nevada Gaming Commission refused to revisit the issue, Frank and Maria Romano brought this action for civil damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Nevada Attorney General and current and former members of the Nevada Gaming Commission and the Nevada Gaming Control Board. The Romanos contend that the defendants violated their constitutional rights by depriving Mr. Romano of his gaming…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- Ove v. GwinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Krainski v. Nevada Ex Rel. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- George Mitchell v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Sandra K. Dunham v. George WadleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.