Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Trump

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided October 22, 2020No. 6:20-cv-00182Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION -- LONDON LARRY BAILEY, Civil Action No. 6: 20-182-KKC Plaintiff, V. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DONALD J. TRUMP and RONNA ROMNEY McDANIEL, Defendants. *** *** *** *** Plaintiff Larry Bailey has filed a pro se complaint pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and other provisions of federal law. [R. 1] The Court has granted his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by prior Order. This matter is before the Court to conduct the initial screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). This statute requires the Court to dismiss any claim…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Hill v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API