Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Parkersburg Builders Material Co. v. Barrack

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1937No. 8537Published

1Concurrence

Kenna, President,

concurring:

I agree with the conclusion reached by the majority of the court that the plaintiff in this case has failed to show that the property as to which it seeks injunctive relief is situated in an exclusively residential section of the City of Parkersburg. Inasmuch as the granting of in-junctive relief to prohibit or abate a nuisance is, excepting where the nuisance involved is said to be a nuisance per se, dependent upon the neighborhood and surrounding conditions, and inasmuch as the plaintiff in this case has not succeeded in bringing itself within the class of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Fruth v. Board of AffairsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API