Fruth v. Board of Affairs
West Virginia Supreme Court
Mandamus by Val Fruth and others against Board of Affairs of the City of Charleston and others.
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, President:
Mandamus to require the Board of Affairs of the City of Charleston to grant to relators, Trustees of St. Paul’s Evangelical Lutheran Church, a permit to construct a church edifice upon their lot at the intersection of Lee Street with Beauregard Street in said city, and having a frontage of 110 feet on each of said streets.
The alternative writ avers that on December 4, 1914, rela-*458tors, in conformity with the requirements of the ordinances of said city, made formal application to the Building Inspector of said city for such permit, and was informed by him, that he would…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- California Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Reduction WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- District of Columbia v. BrookeSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Welch v. SwaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- City of Rochester v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Farley v. GraneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
- Carter v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.