Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stevenson v. Town of Kennebunk

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 26, 2007Published

1Concurrence

ALEXANDER, J.,

with whom CLIFFORD, J., joins, concurring.

[¶ 13] When a three-member municipal board is reduced to two members, and those members are in disagreement, the resulting tie vote is void and of no legal effect. Because the tie vote in the present case cannot result in a default denial of the relief requested, I concur in the result.

[¶ 14] I do not join the Court’s opinion because the Court’s holding that a small municipal board with one member missing cannot act for any purpose, is dictum that reaches beyond what must be addressed to resolve this case, and may confuse and disrupt the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pelkey v. General Electric Capital Assurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  2. Braddy v. ZychMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Clark v. North Bay VillageSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  4. Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of HarrisonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. Inhabitants of Monmouth v. Inhabitants of LeedsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API