Legal Opinion

Mary Williams, D.D.S. and Russell Williams, D.D.S. v. L.M.S.C., Inc., D/B/A the Dental Solution

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 6, 2005No. 01-03-00924-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-03-00924-CV

____________

MARY WILLIAMS, D.D.S. and RUSSELL WILLIAMS, D.D.S., Appellants

V

L.M.S.C., INC., D/B/A THE DENTAL SOLUTION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 750,537

DISSENTING OPINION

The undisputed evidence shows that placement fees for dentists were neither part of, nor contemplated by, the original agreement, and that the agency unilaterally amended that agreement to include those fees by means of addenda to the agreement. I therefore respectfully dissent from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. T.O. Stanley Boot Co. v. Bank of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Walden v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  4. Neeley v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. Mandril v. KasishkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API