Legal Opinion

Clements v. Hall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1921No. Civil No. 1980PublishedCited by 13 opinions

PETITION for Mandamus. Original proceedings.

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs, as residents, qualified electors, and taxpayers of the state of Arizona, *4instituted this proceeding against the defendant, Secretary of State, praying that a writ of mandamus issue against said secretary, directing him to submit at a special election called for November 8, 1921, a certain amendment to the Constitution of the state, proposed, as it is alleged, by the two houses of the legislature, in accordance with article 21 of the Constitution. The proposed amendment to the Constitution is published in the Session Laws of Arizona of 1921, as chapter 85, page 185, and reads…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Cant v. CrossleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Nesbit v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. State v. TausickWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. RathieOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Vulcan Iron Works v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. PelosiArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hutcheson v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Long v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. Boise City v. BaxterIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API