Legal Opinion

Rai v. WB Imico Lexington Fee, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 19, 2012No. Nos. 09 Civ. 9586 (PGG), 09 Civ. 9609 (PGG), 09 Civ. 9610 (PGG), 09 Civ. 9611 (PGG), 09 Civ. 9612 (PGG)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are purchasers of condominium units in “The Lucida,” a condominium development in Manhattan, and have sued to rescind their purchase agreements and recover their deposits based on alleged violations of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1720 (2009) (“ILSA” or the “Act”). (Rai Am. Cmplt. ¶ 1; Haskell Cmplt. ¶¶ 2-4; Benhamou Cmplt. ¶¶ 2-4; Bauer Cmplt. ¶¶ 2-4; Ezzes Cmplt. ¶¶ 2-4) Defendant WB Imico Lexington Fee, LLC (“WB Imico”) has counterclaimed for breach of contract, asserting that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Hicks v. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
Mark Giannullo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.