Legal Opinion
Mark Giannullo v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 10, 2003No. Docket 02-7357PublishedCited by 734 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge KEARSE dissents in a separate opinion.
RAKOFF, District Judge.
Rule 56.1 of the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York (“Local Rule 56.1”) requires a party moving for summary judgment to submit a statement of the allegedly undisputed facts on which the moving party relies, together with citation to the admissible evidence of record supporting each such fact. See Local Rule 56.1(a), (d). If the opposing party then fails to controvert a fact so set forth in the moving party’s Rule 56.1 statement, that fact will be deemed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by734 opinions
- Jackson v. Federal ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford A/s/o Jt International Holdings, B v. V. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Concord Transportation, Inc., Defendant-Cross-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Vermont Teddy Bear Co. v. 1-800 BEARGRAM Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Vermont Teddy Bear Company, Inc. v. 1-800 Beargram CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Kruger v. Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
729 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.