Legal Opinion

Ducharme v. Columbia Engineering Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 17, 1954PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

31 N.J. Super. 167 (1954)

106 A.2d 23

GERTRUDE DuCHARME, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WALDO C. DuCHARME, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

COLUMBIA ENGINEERING CO., INC., A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 24, 1954.

Decided June 17, 1954.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Seymour Rudenstein argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Mellinger & Rudenstein, attorneys).

Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Edward B. Meredith and Messrs. Shaw, Hughes & Pindar, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moore's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  2. Kelly v. Hackensack Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Saintsing v. Steinbach CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Harrison v. StantonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Kelly v. Hackensack Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nemeth v. Michigan Building ComponentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Noble, Etc. v. ZimmermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Sarzillo v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. Grant v. Brownfield's Orthopedic & Prosthetic Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API