Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Inzer

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1960No. 41608PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillespie, J.

Harold G. Williamson, appellant, plaintiff below, sued Jack L. Mabus, Jim Inzer and Wilbur C. Inzer for personal injuries arising out of an automobile-truck collision. The declaration alleged that a truck driven by Mabus was negligently driven against the rear of Wil- liamsons vehicle; that Mabus was operating the truck for and on behalf of Jim Inzer and Wilbur C. Inzer as their employee. When plaintiff rested his case the trial court sustained a motion to exclude the evidence as to Wilbur C. Inzer, and the jury was instructed accordingly. The case proceeded to a conclusion and the jury found…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buntyn v. RobinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fowler Butane Gas Co. v. VarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Clark v. Luther McGill, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Berry v. BruntMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Owens v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. CrawfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API