Legal Opinion

Clark v. Luther McGill, Inc.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1961No. 41715PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillespie, J.

C. A. Hurst Drilling Company, hereinafter called Hurst, is a drilling contractor engaged in the business of drilling oil wells and in connection therewith furnishes its own drilling rig and employs several drilling crews consisting of four men each in charge of a driller. The men under the driller are known as roughnecks, and the superintendent in charge of the drilling crews is known as the tool pusher. When the rig is to be moved to a new location, Hurst contracts with a hauler who moves the heavy equipment to the new location. Luther McGill, Inc., appellee here, hereinafter called McGill,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parkhill Truck Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Rhinelander Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Jeffrey Manufacturing Company v. HannahSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Fontenot v. National Transfer CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Runnels v. BURDINE, D/B/A BURDINE C. CO.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Northern Elec. Co. v. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Jones v. James Reeves Contractors, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Index Drilling Co., Inc. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lucas v. Mississippi Housing Authority No. 8Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Quick Change Oil and Lube, Inc. v. RogersMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API