Legal Opinion

Beatrice Martinez Delgado and Gilbert Hernandez Rodriguez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 1964No. 18880_1PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.

Rodriguez and Delgado were each convicted under counts 8 and 9 of an indictment. Separate judgments were entered against each, and each appeals. The charge was violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, in receiving, concealing and facilitating transportation and concealment of marijuana, which they knew had been imported into the United States contrary to law. We are of the opinion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain an essential element of the offense, possession, upon which alone the government relied. (See second paragraph of section 176a).

Stated most favorably to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. William Evans and Josephine Evans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Clyde Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan Castillo, Aka: Luis Hong Rojas, United States of America v. Antonio De La RentaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Hector Jesus Hernandez, Aka: Mauricio Solis, United States of America v. Jorge Walter CardonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API