Beatrice Martinez Delgado and Gilbert Hernandez Rodriguez v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
Rodriguez and Delgado were each convicted under counts 8 and 9 of an indictment. Separate judgments were entered against each, and each appeals. The charge was violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, in receiving, concealing and facilitating transportation and concealment of marijuana, which they knew had been imported into the United States contrary to law. We are of the opinion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain an essential element of the offense, possession, upon which alone the government relied. (See second paragraph of section 176a).
Stated most favorably to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- William Evans and Josephine Evans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Clyde Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. Juan Castillo, Aka: Luis Hong Rojas, United States of America v. Antonio De La RentaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Hector Jesus Hernandez, Aka: Mauricio Solis, United States of America v. Jorge Walter CardonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.