Legal Opinion

Indemnity Company v. . Perry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 12, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogtoen, J.

The bond executed by the defendant referred specifically to the contract between the defendant and the city of High Point, and the contract “for construction of water and sewer improvements in High Point, North Carolina,” was expressly made a part of said bond. The obligation of the bond was to the effect that if the defendant principal should faithfully perform said contract according to the terms and conditions thereof, then the obligation would be void, or otherwise remain in full force and effect. The contract provided not only for the “proposed water and sewer connections in the northern…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCracken v. Greensboro, Northern & Atlantic Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Hutchins v. Bank.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. Victor v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Trustees of Charlotte Township v. Piedmont Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Snow Hill Banking & Trust Co. v. D. J. Odom Drug Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of High Point v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Lentz v. K. B. Johnson & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Union Indemnity Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Arbogast v. . Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Arbogast v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API