Legal Opinion

Schrader v. Bell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1989No. 89-138Published

1Opinion of the Court

781 S.W.2d 466 (1989)

301 Ark. 38

Richard SCHRADER and Betty Schrader, Individually and As Next Friend of David Schrader, Appellants,

v.

James Edward BELL and Barbara Bell, Appellees.

No. 89-138.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

December 18, 1989.

Thomas B. Pryor, Fort Smith, for appellants.

Gary D. Person, Fort Smith, Bill R. Perceful, Pocola, for appellees.

DUDLEY, Justice.

The jury returned a defendant's verdict in this case involving a car wreck at an intersection. The trial court granted the plaintiff's motion for a new trial. We reverse and dismiss.

In 1982, we amended ARCP Rule 59(a)(6) to state that a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Wood Sawmill, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Clayton v. WagnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Schrader v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Brant v. SorrellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Wilson v. KoberaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API