Legal Opinion
Oceana, Inc. v. Locke
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 25, 2009No. Civil Action 08-318 (ESH)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Oceana, Inc. (“Oceana”) has filed for summary judgment on its claim that defendants Secretary of Commerce Gary F. Locke, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) (collectively, “the agency”) violated the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1884; the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4370Í; and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706, through the issuance of a final rule…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Pacific Shores Subdivision California Water District v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- District Hospital Partners, L.P. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Berge v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Safari Club International v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Oceana, Inc. v. LockeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Oceana, Inc. v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.