Legal Opinion

Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp. v. Diamond Shamrock Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 23, 1980No. Civ-79-714PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, Chief Judge.

Complexity inheres in patent cases. This one is no exception. Without recounting all of the relevant facts, I shall endeavor to explain.

At stake is the validity of seven patents: United States Letters Patent Nos. 3,591,-483; 3,674,676; 3,707,454; 3,793,163; 3,928,-166; 4,025,405; and 4,192,725. [Hereinafter patents will be referred to by their last three digits.] They concern electrolysis, the process by which water or brine is rendered into its constituent parts. The original complaint of Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corporation [“Hooker”] sought a declaratory judgment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI CORP.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
  2. Hu v. CrockettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Ward v. Follett Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
  4. Plating Resources, Inc. v. UTI Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  5. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Diamond Shamrock Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API