Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp. v. Diamond Shamrock Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIN, Chief Judge.
Complexity inheres in patent cases. This one is no exception. Without recounting all of the relevant facts, I shall endeavor to explain.
At stake is the validity of seven patents: United States Letters Patent Nos. 3,591,-483; 3,674,676; 3,707,454; 3,793,163; 3,928,-166; 4,025,405; and 4,192,725. [Hereinafter patents will be referred to by their last three digits.] They concern electrolysis, the process by which water or brine is rendered into its constituent parts. The original complaint of Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corporation [“Hooker”] sought a declaratory judgment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI CORP.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Hu v. CrockettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Ward v. Follett Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Plating Resources, Inc. v. UTI Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Diamond Shamrock Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.