Cassidy v. Transit Department
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
Upon the admitted facts in the case, the petitioner is a veteran and so certified on the, civil service rolls, and entitled to veteran’s preference within the meaning of G. L. c. 31. On or about September 21, 1921, the civil service department of the Commonwealth assigned him for permanent service as a subway blacksmith, Boston transit department. Under date of April 2, 1924, he was notified in writing by Thomas F. Sullivan, chairman of that department, that his services would be terminated at the close of business April 5, by reason of lack of work. On May 13, 1924, this petition for a writ…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ransom v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Ayers v. HatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Mahoney v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- McCarthy v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Logan v. Mayor & Aldermen of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peckham v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Cullen v. Mayor of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- McKenna v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Funston v. District School Board, Etc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Bois v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.