Legal Opinion
Funston v. District School Board, Etc.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 1929PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The plaintiff apparently does not contend that the legislative enactment, commonly referred to by the teaching profession as the Tenure of Office Act, being Session Laws of 1913, Chapter 37, as amended by Session Laws of 1917, Chapter 152, and again amended by Session Laws of 1921, Chapter 217, which is the legislation she relies upon, deprives the board of directors of power to effect economies, re-arrange the curriculum or adopt any other course which may incidentally lessen the need for teacher’s services; but argues that the aforementioned act stays the hand of the board when it proposes…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Corrigan v. . the Mayor, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Fitzsimmons v. O'NeillIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Garvey v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Phillips v. . Mayor, Etc., City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Hill v. Mayor of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lommasson v. School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Steinmetz v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 529Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Dugas v. Ascension Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Hartman v. Merged Area VI Community CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Graney v. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.