Legal Opinion

Gelberg v. Richardson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1936No. 7966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, as attorney for a creditor’s committee, petitioned the District Court for an order directing appellee, as receiver for Western Blind & Screen Company, to pay appellant a fee of $1,250 for services alleged to have been rendered in the receivership proceeding described in Gripton v. Richardson (C.C.A.9) 82 F.(2d) 313, decided this day. From a decree denying appellant’s petition, he prosecutes this appeal.

Although it did not terminate the receivership proceeding, the decree determined appellant’s rights by rejecting his claim. Such a decree is “final,” within…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dexter Horton Nat. Bank v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  2. Gripton v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hultman v. TevisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  2. Humphreys Gold Corp. v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. Dant & Russell, Inc. v. J. D. Halstead Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. Berry v. EarlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. Kelling Nut Co. v. National Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API