Gelberg v. Richardson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, as attorney for a creditor’s committee, petitioned the District Court for an order directing appellee, as receiver for Western Blind & Screen Company, to pay appellant a fee of $1,250 for services alleged to have been rendered in the receivership proceeding described in Gripton v. Richardson (C.C.A.9) 82 F.(2d) 313, decided this day. From a decree denying appellant’s petition, he prosecutes this appeal.
Although it did not terminate the receivership proceeding, the decree determined appellant’s rights by rejecting his claim. Such a decree is “final,” within…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dexter Horton Nat. Bank v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- Gripton v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hultman v. TevisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Humphreys Gold Corp. v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Dant & Russell, Inc. v. J. D. Halstead Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Berry v. EarlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Kelling Nut Co. v. National Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944