Legal Opinion
Purtee v. General Motors Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 1956No. 2372PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MILLER, Presiding Judge:
This is a law appeal from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court sustaining a demurrer to the petition for the reason that it appears on the face thereof that the action was not brought within the time limited for the commencement of such actions. The record reveals that the action is one in which the plaintiff was seeking the right to participate in the benefits accorded to employees under the Workmen’s Compensation Act; that his claim was rejected by the Commission on July 10, 1951; that on July 27, 1951, a petition was filed seeking the allowance of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Automobile Sales Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Matter of Decker v. Pouvailsmith Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Louisville N.R. Co. v. DixonMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- Pinson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- King v. Mayor of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gordon v. Young, Admr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960
- Keen v. General Motors Corp.Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas · 1958