Keen v. General Motors Corp.
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By McBRIDE, J.:
At the request of the attorney general for reconsideration written and oral arguments were received by the court. The attorney general urged that the use of the expression “further proceedings” in §4123.51.9 R. C., should be construed to increase the requirements for the petition to include matter not expressed in the statute in the preceding part of the same sentence which provides that the petition shall
“set forth the basis for jurisdiction of the court over the action * * *” and nothing more. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. This specific requirement cannot be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Purtee v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gordon v. Young, Admr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960