Legal Opinion

Tuma v. Kosterman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1984No. 14516Published

1Opinion of the Court

682 P.2d 1275 (1984)

106 Idaho 728

Linda J. Heath TUMA, Claimant-Respondent,

v.

William J. KOSTERMAN, Fantasy Thoroughbred Farms, Employer, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14516.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 14, 1984.

Robert J. Insinger, of Risch, Goss, Insinger & Salladay, Boise, for defendant-appellant.

Ronald M. Morris, and Charles B. Bauer, of Lyons, Bohner, Chasan & Walton, Boise, for claimant-respondent.

DONALDSON, Chief Justice.

This case is an appeal from a ruling of the Idaho Industrial Commission on the sole issue of whether appellant (employer) may claim an exemption from liability under the Idaho…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Pinson Ex Rel. Pinson v. Minidoka Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Gifford v. NottinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Taylor v. Blackwell Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Ledesma v. BergesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API